Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 05:34
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
White House Walks Back U.S.-Built LNG Carrier Ambitions - The Maritime Executive
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What sexual experience did you have at a highway rest area?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?